Entertainer Amanda Seales drew sharp reactions this week after describing President Donald Trump as a “revolutionary” during a September 27 Instagram Live. Seales, known for her outspoken political commentary, argued that the label applies not as praise but as a critique of how revolution is often misunderstood in American discourse.
“You know what’s the truth that y’all don’t want to hear? Trump is a revolutionary,” Seales told her viewers. She quickly clarified that many people incorrectly assume the term always signals progress. Instead, she said, revolution fundamentally means the overthrow of existing systems in favor of an alternative form of government. An upheaval that can be constructive or destructive.
“Revolution is overthrow in favor of an alternative government. That is revolution,” she explained.
Her framing suggested that Trump’s rise to power, and the movement that fueled it, represented a revolutionary shift in American politics. Not because it strengthened democracy, but because it disrupted established norms and redirected political influence.
Seales also pushed back against viewers who challenged her characterization in real time. She threatened to block detractors rather than debate what she viewed as overly simplistic interpretations of her argument. “If you think that revolution only comes in a package of progress for the people, you are incorrect,” she said.
Amanda Seales Calls President Donald Trump A “Revolutionary”
Beyond labeling Trump, Seales questioned why progressive leaders have not used equally disruptive strategies to achieve systemic change. “If you know what’s a true study, the method that they have deployed in order to do as such, then you need to ask yourself, why haven’t the people that we have empowered done the same?” she asked.
Her comments display a broader frustration with political dynamics in the United States. It suggests that progressive movements have been less effective in harnessing the kind of disruptive energy that has fueled conservative momentum.
By calling Trump a “revolutionary,” Seales sought to challenge her audience to reconsider the meaning of revolution itself. In her view, the concept is neutral—it can dismantle institutions as easily as it can build them.
Her remarks reframed the conversation. It emphasizes that revolutionary energy is not inherently righteous but a tool that can be wielded for vastly different ends.
Leave a Reply