Angel Reese’s response to her NBA 2K26 rating was as understated as it was headline-worthy.
When informed she earned a 93 overall score—placing her among the top 10 WNBA players in the game—the Chicago Sky forward simply asked, “Does that mean something?”
The moment, captured during an interview with podcaster Andrew Jerrell Jones, quickly went viral for its blend of curiosity and composure.
Reese didn’t linger on the number. After a brief pause, she shrugged, offering only, “Great. Thanks.”
For a player whose rookie season was filled with scrutiny, comparisons, and constant social media chatter, the reaction spoke volumes. Rather than embrace the virtual accolade, Reese made clear her focus remains on real-world success, not digital validation.
That mindset tracks with the identity she has built since entering the league. Confident yet grounded, Reese has become one of the WNBA’s most talked-about figures, often juxtaposed with fellow rising star Caitlin Clark. Their rivalry has fueled narratives across the sport, but Reese’s offhand dismissal of a video-game rating underscored her refusal to be defined by outside noise.
Her reaction also shed light on the broader culture surrounding NBA 2K. For many fans, player ratings function as symbolic endorsements, sparking debates across social platforms.
Reese’s indifference, however, highlighted the disconnect between gaming perception and on-court reality. She reminded audiences that while ratings can fuel conversation, they ultimately have little to do with a player’s growth, preparation, or performance.
In the end, Reese’s quip added another layer to her rising profile. It was playful, but pointed—a subtle rejection of manufactured hype. For a player determined to cement her impact in the WNBA, the moment affirmed what has always driven her: results that matter in the box score, not the console.
Leave a Reply