Amid escalating scrutiny of the case against Diddy, a seasoned video forensics expert has challenged the legitimacy of footage alleged to capture an assault on Cassie Ventura. Conor McCourt, a former NYPD officer with a background in video analysis, submitted a sworn deposition to Diddy’s legal team, claiming the recording is fundamentally flawed and lacks evidentiary integrity.
TMZ reports that McCourt scrutinized two central video clips: a CNN-released segment and an iPhone recording of that same footage played back on another screen. His analysis raises concerns that CNN’s version might have undergone transcoding, a process that can subtly alter frame accuracy and impact visual clarity. He further contends that the iPhone clip, by capturing a screen rather than the source file, inflates Diddy’s presence on camera, potentially warping how the incident is perceived.
Disputed Video Evidence Casts Doubt on Case Integrity
McCourt’s sworn testimony calls out major flaws in the time-stamping of various video formats, casting doubt on whether key moments were captured without alteration. He asserts unequivocally that “none of the available video files are accurate and reliable copies of the original”—a determination that could carry weight as the trial approaches.
Diddy’s attorneys are urging the court to bar the footage from evidence, accusing CNN of doctoring the only known copy with basic editing tools and erasing the original. In a letter filed last month, the defense claims the network tampered with the video’s time stamp, sped up the playback, and distorted the sequence of events. As the courtroom battle unfolds, prosecutors plan to introduce the footage to underscore what they describe as the mogul’s pattern of aggression—though the episode itself isn’t tied to the present indictment. Jury selection is set for May 5, with opening arguments slated for May 12.
CNN, pushing back on the allegations, maintains that it neither altered the footage nor discarded the original, which it says remains with the source. The network noted that its segment featuring the video aired well before Diddy’s arrest. With the case gaining national attention, the reliability—and potential distortion—of video evidence has emerged as a central issue, intensifying debates over how visuals are used, trusted, and challenged in the courtroom.
Leave a Reply